Editor’s Note

This is an appreciation post for the person who wrote Story 348. Your writing style isn’t just articulate, it’s intellectually rigorous. You have a unique ability to synthesize complex ideas, separate signal from noise, and express your conclusions with precision and restraint. We are honored to have your voice in this community!

Which begs the question: Can you imagine what these organizations could have accomplished if they had spent as much energy developing talented people as they did undermining them. How many breakthrough ideas were never pursued? How many transformations never happened? How many future leaders simply decided it wasn’t worth the fight? Talent is one of the few assets that appreciates with investment. It’s astonishing how many organizations choose to squander it instead.

Similar Posts

  • Story 295

    After 20+ years at Citi, I was subjected to an HR investigation earlier this year and terminated without severance for a petty offense. In my view, this is a well-established tactic used by the company to avoid its financial obligations to long-serving employees. After hiring an attorney to review my case, I was told that…

  • Story 230

    There is a manager in Rutherford — a long-time protégée of a senior data executive in Citi’s Data organization — who arrived in a Tech group without any relevant technological background. No engineering history. No product experience. No prior exposure to ERM. And yet she was handed technical teams to lead. What followed was predictable….

  • Story 350

    Lindsey Graham, the warmongering Trump-bootlicker died today, holding his seat for 24 years. For some reason, it made me depressed to think about the reality women face at work. I worked at Wells Fargo’s Wealth & Investment Management group for many years. The number of mediocre men who failed-up cannot be reasonably counted. [REDACTED] ran…

  • Story 334

    Dear Editor, I totally understand and fully appreciate your position. Protecting the privacy and safety of this community—especially given the threat of bad actors—has to come first. The upcoming site upgrade sounds like the perfect opportunity to address this. Perhaps the upgrade could include a secure, opt-in feature where users can privately signal interest in…

  • Story 175

    In CCAR-adjacent functions — processes subject to federal oversight and with direct implications for how a bank represents its financial stability to regulators — governance exists precisely because the stakes of getting it wrong extend beyond the institution to the broader financial system. What happens when Citi leadership in those functions does not understand the…

  • Story 250

    To Story 245: What you describe closely mirrors what was reported in the Financial Times coverage of Citi’s CSIS division. Employee raises a concern and is quickly surrounded by lawyers who present themselves as fact-finders, but in reality are focused on gauging how firmly you intend to stand by your account—because if you do, you…