Story 139

How are the stories of sexual harassment reported by women perceived?

Men rarely imagine themselves as supporters of sexual abuse. Most would say, honestly, that they oppose it. And yet, again and again, when a woman speaks about being sexually harmed, the first instinct from other men is not to ask what happened to her, but what it might cost him.

They close ranks quietly. They don’t always shout or threaten. More often, they doubt. They minimize. They joke. They ask for “proof” in a way that suggests none will ever be enough. They say things like he’s a good guy, he’d never do that, she’s probably exaggerating, why now? Each sentence sounds reasonable on its own. Together, they form a wall. That wall protects the abuser far more effectively than violence ever could.

Men support men who sexually abuse women not always by defending the act, but by defending the man. They protect his reputation, his future, his comfort. They worry about false accusations more than real harm. They worry about ruining a man’s life more than acknowledging a woman’s pain. Women’s stories are treated as suspect by default. Their memories are interrogated, their tone analyzed, their pasts dragged into the light as if pain must be earned through perfection. If she was drinking, she’s unreliable. If she wasn’t, why didn’t she fight harder? If she froze, why didn’t she scream? If she stayed quiet, why didn’t she speak sooner? There is always a reason her story doesn’t quite qualify as truth.

Meanwhile, men accused of sexual abuse are granted empathy. Their humanity is protected fiercely, while women are flattened into caricatures: liars, temptresses, attention-seekers, vindictive exes. This is how abuse survives socially. Not just through force, but through disbelief.

So women learn the rules early. We learn that telling the truth might cost us more than staying silent. That our pain will be debated like a thought experiment. That we will be asked to perform our trauma in exactly the right way, or not be believed at all.

Believing women is not radical. It’s not reckless. It’s not anti-men. It’s simply a refusal to let comfort outweigh justice, or loyalty outweigh truth. Until more men choose that refusal, abuse will continue to be a private trauma and a public secret, carried by women, protected by men.

Similar Posts

  • Story 1

    In 2024, while working as an MD at Citi, I was subjected to the most biased, frankly shocking, HR investigation of my 25 year career. What at first appeared to be a routine inquiry quickly turned into a hit job shaped less by facts and more by assumptions, insinuations, and gendered interpretation of behavior. The…

  • Story 127

    I am a 45 year old saleswomen who works in a European bank in London & has in the business a long time and pretty thick skinned. At my Christmas party last year I was talking to my American boss who was visiting from NY about our teenage children and how much more open they…

  • Story 110

    Hi – please ensure that stories don’t carry racial undertone. Generic stories about India men are unfair and will only lead to racial tension. We can write tons of stories of white men and women, including the affairs they are having while still being in seat. We can understand if there is specific story /…

  • Story 149

    “A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within.” — Will Durant There is a quiet fact that circulates among Citi employees, rarely spoken aloud but widely understood: many of them don’t bank with Citi. This is particularly true in the Consumer Bank, where employees see the gap between…

  • Story 130

    How Many Voices Does It Take? One cannot help but think of Harvey Weinstein as Epstein’s extensive network of evil slowly absorbs into public consciousness. In a public video, Mariska Hargitay relayed something chilling about why Weinstein finally fell: there were “too many women’s voices” to ignore. Take a moment to process the implications of…

  • Story 369

    Over 23 years at Citibank, this Managing Director has perfected a technique for removing targeted employees from impact long before they’re shown the door. The method is simple: quietly strip away their workload, redirect it toward favored staff, and systematically deny them the opportunity to demonstrate their abilities. By the time restructuring or layoffs arrive,…