Editor’s Note

We want to address a theme that women have had to tolerate since the beginning of time: the tendency to assign blame to women for situations involving work, relationships, or professional power dynamics.

WallStreetDiscriminates does not publish stories in order to litigate individual encounters in the court of public opinion. We publish stories to identify patterns of behavior, power imbalances, and workplace dynamics that are difficult to report through traditional channels.

We also want to be very clear about something:
We do not tolerate slut-shaming, victim-blaming, or the idea that a woman’s personal decisions negate her right to professional respect, safety, or fair treatment at work.

History shows that when women report misconduct — whether harassment, retaliation, or inappropriate relationships involving power — the first response is not to examine the behavior of the person in power, but to examine the woman’s behavior, her clothing, her drinking, her decisions, or her character. That pattern is not accidental, and it has discouraged reporting for decades.

Women can make imperfect decisions and still deserve:

  • to not be taken advantage of
  • to not be retaliated against
  • to not have their careers harmed
  • to be treated professionally
  • to be heard without being publicly shamed

We would also gently encourage everyone, especially women, to reflect on an uncomfortable truth: internalized misogyny is real, and often women are the harshest judges of other women, holding them to standards we would never apply to men in similar situations.

If readers disagree with a story, that is their right. But attacks on a woman’s character, sexuality, or personal decisions are not productive and will not be published on this site.

We also received the suggestion to expand our mission to support entry/mid-level Asian and white men. Thank you but our mission remains focused on women.

Similar Posts

  • Editor’s Note

    This is an appreciation post for the person who wrote Story 348. Your writing style isn’t just articulate, it’s intellectually rigorous. You have a unique ability to synthesize complex ideas, separate signal from noise, and express your conclusions with precision and restraint. We are honored to have your voice in this community! Which begs the…

  • Story 185

    I’m a senior HR business partner at Citi. I want to discuss the two lawsuits that are everywhere in social media. Bravo to these courageous women because their fight is talked about constantly in HR circles. I support them, I do, but they need to know what they’re up against. This will be the fight…

  • Story 279

    1/2 I work in finance, which loves to believe it’s hyper-rational and merit-based. My wife’s a Korean pediatric dentist – excellent at what she does – but she still deals with patients second-guessing her, assuming she’s not the doctor, or making the usual awkward comments about where she’s “really” from. It’s rarely dramatic, just constant…

  • Story 195

    I spent a while at my first job out of school supporting a toxic MD. A few examples: And countless others. The stories here let me know I’m not crazy and I’m not alone. They really gaslight you into thinking it’s just you and you’re being dramatic.

  • Story 170

    Wall Street End Game Was anyone else disturbed, when Ruemmler stepped down as CLO, by Goldman Sachs’ former CEO Blankfein’s comment that in years past, the firm wouldn’t have gone after bad actor employees for fear it might make it harder to retain talent? Usually you hear the opposite argument. Employees don’t publicly denounce malfeasance…

  • Editor’s Note

    Today marks WallStreetDiscriminates’ six-month anniversary. We have been humbled by the volume of stories, support, and engagement the platform has received. Every person here has contributed to a broader conversation about what happens when powerful institutions abuse their power and, in doing so, we have forced an uncomfortable question into the open: why has a…