Post 40

Citi has a culture that supports misogyny, gender bias, and a wide array of unethical employment practices.

For close to 20 years I have witnessed and, at times, been subjected to all of the above. For the most part, Citi reinforces an environment of apathy towards whistleblowers or those who “complain”. This is despite a firmwide message (and internal training) that every employee should speak up if they see or are subject to any action that is unethical or harmful. Citi doesn’t practice what they preach in any of those trainings. At all.

I was asked to relocate to a city that was a “lower cost” center than where I was originally based to help start up a team. Another NY colleague (male) also made the move, and when we arrived, I was told I was going to report to him. Same C level. Ok, I was eager to prove what I could build, made the move and jumped right in. Soon it became apparent through conversations with mutual colleagues that had strong inside information that his salary was kept intact while mine was decreased 15% (HR said due to lower cost city salary impact).

Not one year after moving, the male colleague moved to another firm, and I interviewed for and got his position. Though not with a salary increase. I was told by HR that that type of salary jump wasn’t possible. So they could decrease a salary by 15% but then not make it whole by the same amount? I formally complained to HR and, after “investigation”, was told I couldn’t prove his salary wasn’t lowered when he moved. They said they could provide me with internal postings that may be better suited, but wouldn’t be in my current city, seeing as I was in a “low-cost center”. I had just moved my entire life across multiple states, and therefore stayed and figured I would prove myself because Citi would see my value and increase my salary at some point, right? I was wrong.

I eventually grew the team to 6x the original size and became global in scope. My responsibilities were vast and now the role should warrant that increase at least back to my original Citi salary, right? Nope. I continued to build the team, surpassing goals, working 24/7, and receiving high ratings, internal awards, and praise from colleagues throughout the firm. Now I should warrant that increase, right? Nope. I was told over and over, by male managers, that it wasn’t possible. I was even told at one point that I was too “pushy” and was “building an army”. No, I was hiring a professional team to do a job important to the goals of Citi for the business and clients based on projects and deliverables assigned to me by the firm.

I went back to HR with metrics, examples etc. – crickets.

Finally, at one point, a male interim head gave me a 10% “raise” – I was overjoyed. At last, Citi was moving me back towards the original salary I earned over 8 years prior (when I had a smaller team and fewer responsibilities). They are finally seeing my worth. Nope. I came to learn it was a salary “shift”, not a raise. Back to square one. I complained to HR again, seeing as this was delivered at year-end as a raise, not a shift – crickets.

This is ONE example of many experiences that I have, and it illustrates the inequity and gender bias at Citi. After being here for 20 years, the level of discrimination against women has actually worsened with the current leadership. Great, talented women who have vast financial acumen are walking out the door, and for good reason.

I thank everyone who started this site and who has posted. The gaslighting at Citi makes me feel insane on a daily basis and question my worth, and hearing these stories makes me realize I AM SANE, I SHOULD BE VALUED, and I AM NOT ALONE. THANK YOU!!

Citi should take heed as they are rotting from the inside out, thanks to their approach towards women around unethical employment practices, false narratives and the weaponization of HR by leadership.

I know I need to get out.

Similar Posts

  • Story 60

    RE: Story 59 Based on my two decades of experience in capital markets at a large Canadian bank as a woman, I have consistently observed that during layoffs, men of color are let go first, followed by women. Only when no other options remain are white men affected. While leadership often points to DEI initiatives,…

  • Story 321

    What does not surprise me is that it’s Citi. What does surprise me is that it’s Citi US. I started my career at Citi in India, in a back-office team supporting global investment banking operations. Interestingly, I wasn’t even aware it was a back-office role because that was never mentioned in the job description. The…

  • Story 167

    To Story 166: This is less irony and more a deliberate counter-narrative strategy. Placing that individual visibly at the helm of the Women’s Network creates a documented record that can be deployed against existing discrimination claims — optics engineered to contradict an inconvenient paper trail. The mechanism operates at every level of the organization. In…

  • Story 358

    “Owning it” only counts when it costs you something. USCC was warned that more cases would surface around a particular repeat bully and discriminator. A two-year record of actionable complaints wasn’t enough for them apparently. Now, more have surfaced. Two makes a trend. Three makes a pattern. Beyond that, are they cultivating a teflon class…

  • Story 199

    BNY is discriminating but not just woman. Sr mgmt has enforced a certain % of performance be marked below expectations or off track so mgmt falsified thousands of peoples 2025 eoy reviews to meet that threshold. This not only cost employees their jobs but bny didnt pay severance. And those who were marked low but…