Story 234

1/2

Story 228 highlights the degree to which the powerful men in finance are complicit in keeping women in check and the uphill battle we face on Wall Street. It’s not just about individual behaviour, but the systems that enable it and then distance themselves from the consequences. We’re encouraged to focus on the incident, the personality, the “bad actor,” while ignoring the fact that the infrastructure which allows it to persist operates in plain sight.

Take the recent reporting on Telegram. For years, the platform has been linked to criminal activity — including drug trafficking, fraud, and the widespread distribution of non-consensual sexual content and AI-generated abuse targeting women. In August 2024, its founder, Pavel Durov, was arrested in France and subsequently placed under formal investigation in connection with allegations that Telegram failed to co-operate with authorities on these matters. That investigation is ongoing. None of this was obscure – it was all a matter of public record.

And yet, in May 2025, Telegram raised approximately $1.5 billion through a convertible bond issuance backed by major institutional investors, including BlackRock and Citadel. This was not early-stage speculation. Capital flowed in after the governance concerns, safety issues, and legal scrutiny were already well documented. The purpose of the financing was to refinance existing debt and stabilise the organisation — in effect, to ensure the platform could continue operating at scale. Worth noting these two firms maintain board seats on ICI.

The harm, the platform, and the capital that sustains it are treated as separate narratives when, in practice, they are closely connected. No one needs to explicitly endorse misogyny if they are prepared to fund — or simply sustain — the systems that allow it to persist. It appears in what is normalised, what is financed, and what is ultimately deprioritised.

It also explains why the fight is uneven and exhausting. Women are expected to manage behaviour, mitigate risk, and protect ourselves within systems that are simultaneously being reinforced by decisions made at a far remove. The challenge is not only to call out what is happening, but to recognise how many layers are quietly working to keep it in place.

Thank you to the brave women behind this platform for giving a safe place to air it.

Similar Posts

  • Story 130

    How Many Voices Does It Take? One cannot help but think of Harvey Weinstein as Epstein’s extensive network of evil slowly absorbs into public consciousness. In a public video, Mariska Hargitay relayed something chilling about why Weinstein finally fell: there were “too many women’s voices” to ignore. Take a moment to process the implications of…

  • Story 114

    Public Service Announcement – The Severance Trap: What Wall Street Hopes You Don’t Know Severance agreements aren’t neutral documents. They’re surrender agreements drafted by armies of corporate lawyers to strip you of your voice and legal rights. My advice to anyone facing termination: * Do not sign anything immediately. You’re in shock and financially vulnerable—that’s…

  • Story 178

    Female. At Citi for more than ten years. UK. At one point my manager a male MD pursued me relentlessly. I did not report it. My belief, right or wrong, was that HR existed primarily to protect the senior person, not me. Speaking up felt indistinguishable from career suicide, so I handled the situation quietly…

  • Story 267

    Gentle reader, this author has observed many a spectacle in her time. Yet nothing — not the most brazen advancement seeker of no particular merit, not the most shameless title hunter — quite prepares one for the singular institution that is Citi. For at Citi, no one will give you a job description. But if…

  • Story 50

    I have been beyond astonished and dismayed by the stories I have read here and I’m also so glad that so many people have a place to speak up and be heard! It is nice not to feel so alone and clearly something needs to change! If sharing on this forum facilitates that then bravo!…

  • Story 173

    The Government Contractor Shield Citi invoked government contractor status to mandate COVID vaccines — a legally and politically contentious decision that affected every employee globally. It was framed as compliance obligation rather than corporate choice. The message being: our hands are tied by our relationship with the government. Then when the Trump administration dismantled DEI…