There’s a [REDACTED] MD in USCC with a troubling habit of building an image she never backs up with action or achievement.
She makes a show of supporting women, yet quietly undermines them the moment their intelligence, capability, or accomplishments begin to outshine her own.
Her title isn’t enough to make her feel secure, and why would it be? She didn’t secure her position through something other than skill and ability.
Her jealousy drives her to claim other women’s contributions as her own.
And can you really call yourself a supporter of women when you drop your knickers between 388-15-21 and the Sunshine State?