Story 25

Nearly 10 years now in the industry and still a distinct lack of senior females specifically on the trading floor at Citi. To rub salt further into the wound Citi Markets disbanded/restructured their Women’s employee resource group (along with other DEI groups in Markets) due to pressure to adhere with US government new diversity policies.


The only way things change is by speaking out, speaking with your feet and leaving toxic work environments.


We won’t put up with it anymore.

Similar Posts

  • Post 37

    As an attorney who has spent years reviewing employment decisions across large financial institutions, I can say that all of the stories on this site feel familiar. But #31 is especially important to call out because it happens every day in corporate settings. Elevating a more junior man over a senior woman – then requiring…

  • Story 166

    Here’s an irony only Citigroup could pull off: placing the Women’s Network under the leadership of a man whose own organisation has managed to “disappear” an astonishing number of high-profile women since he arrived, while proudly welcoming an army of white men to save us from diversity.

  • Story 117

    My Story Is Not Unique: An Open Invitation, An If and When You Are Ready  We want to begin by saying : we admire the courage it takes to share your stories. The stories held here matter. They reflect truth, resilience, and care for yourselves and for others who may recognize their own experiences in…

  • Story 299

    The Head of Risk at USCC likes to say she was trained by great managers. The results haven’t shown up in how she develops her own people. For years, she has harbored a repeat bully, harasser, and discriminator in her group — shielding her from any accountability, any consequence, any scrutiny. The reward for years…

  • Story 160

    KNOW YOUR RIGHTS Citi Ethics has been known to ask employees during investigations whether they’ve made reports to regulators or blown the whistle with outside parties. Citi’s own policies state that company policy does NOT prohibit employees from speaking with regulators. So why is the Ethics team quietly asking employees whether they did exactly that…