Story 207

To stories 203 and 206: I believe you. Both of you. On an instinct level. And that matters, because if it lands that way for me, it will land that way for others. Your accounts have the texture of truth. Speak them.

What I would tell you both: do not walk into HR alone. Engage an employment lawyer who specializes in sexual harassment before you say a single word internally. HR protects the institution. A lawyer protects you. That sequence changes everything.

I would still encourage you to report. Not because the system deserves your trust — it hasn’t earned it — but because your accounts may be the thing that protects the next woman. Patterns like this don’t end on their own. They end when someone creates a record.

Reading your stories triggered me. I worked under an MD at Citi whose behavior toward “beautiful people” was discussed with me by both his male and female direct reports — and it made my skin crawl.

He was meeting with my directs 1:1 without informing me. I warned my new hires to speak up if anything felt wrong. There had been no explicit allegations. But that instinctive alarm is itself an indicator of predatory behavior. We know it when we feel it.

I wish I had done more at the time. I pondered how to confront what I was feeling, but without a formal allegation, I didn’t know how.

You are not alone. You are believed. Do not be shamed into silence. The times are a-changing.

Similar Posts

  • Story 250

    To Story 245: What you describe closely mirrors what was reported in the Financial Times coverage of Citi’s CSIS division. Employee raises a concern and is quickly surrounded by lawyers who present themselves as fact-finders, but in reality are focused on gauging how firmly you intend to stand by your account—because if you do, you…

  • Story 315

    A Forensic Autopsy of a Career Assassination: The Promise. The Reorg. The Demotion. There is a particular kind of institutional betrayal that is engineered to look like circumstance. In ERM Tech & Data at Citi, where in-group loyalty overrides merit and the rule of law, a role was promised. Then she raised concerns — about…

  • Story 310

    This week, Fortune published a favorable profile of Jane Fraser and Citi’s turnaround. It is worth reading — for what it chooses not to examine. For investors, Fortune provides the “What” — the plan, the metrics, the narrative arc. What it does not provide is the “How” — the friction, the trust deficit, the litigation…

  • Story 286

    I’ve been out of the country for a while and am just getting caught up. Did Jane Fraser really end up hiring a second polarizing figure as her potential successor at Citi? The Financial Times piece on [REDACTED], the head of investment banking, is a wild ride. And is it true she paid him a…

  • Story 193

    My annual performance review in December (and every year prior): “She is integral to our team.” My mid-year review, just after discovering and reporting a fiduciary breakdown: “She does everything wrong and needs significant improvement by year-end.” There needs to be fundamental changes in HR practices, and senior managers who behave this badly should be…