Story 263
[REDACTED] has been Citi’s Chief Human Resources Officer since July 2018. That title implies professional authority over the function. Think again.
[REDACTED] is not an HR executive who came up through the discipline. She is a Jane Fraser loyalist who was handed the department.
Their relationship goes back to 2007, when [REDACTED] worked directly under Fraser during the financial crisis. In 2009, Fraser personally recommended her as chief of staff to board chair Richard Parsons — [REDACTED] was still in her 20s.
She has served as a sounding board to successive CEOs and board chairs ever since. Bloomberg’s December 2022 profile named her the “CEO whisperer” — a behind-the-scenes counselor to Citi’s leadership, virtually unknown outside the firm.
If she earned that title honestly, then you know exactly who is responsible for the culture documented on this site.
Her stated leadership goal is to make a big organization feel small — where people feel like family and at home. Read that against everything women at Citi have described here. Then decide what it means.
In a 2024 town hall, [REDACTED] expressed hope that employees were now clear on how performance is measured. Banks have been measuring performance for decades.
The fact that clarity on the subject required announcement — in 2024 — tells you everything about the function she runs, and the way Citi makes people decisions at all.
HR at Citi are value destroyers. They enforce their existence through policy, not competence. Certain decisions require HR to be in the loop — not because they add judgment, but because the policy says so.
Remove that policy requirement and ask yourself what remains of their business partnership. This is a function that has substituted process for purpose and called it HR.