Story 278

I cover Citigroup at an affiliate news agency in the UK focused on financial services. The Financial Times published an article today on [REDACTED] that raises two notable issues: questions about the rigor of Citi’s due diligence process and whether the firm should have been aware of prior workplace concerns surrounding his departure from JPMorgan. While some of those concerns had circulated in the market, they were not formally substantiated at the time of his hiring. The rumours, essentially, were that he is a bully with a toxic management style, something the FT article validates from multiple sources.

Separate from that, many reporters who cover Wall Street are aware of a letter that was sent to Citi’s Board of Directors in January 2025 raising concerns about the conduct of the “star get” they hired to run wealth, which also include allegations of an extremely volatile management style. I have not independently verified the contents of that correspondence, nor has it been made public.

However, it is my understanding that it was written in the style of yet another letter written to the BoD, summarized as follows by Google: “A group claiming to be ten former Citigroup managing directors sent a five-page letter to the board in October 2024, demanding the clawback of bonuses for hundreds of managers and reduced spending on consultants. The group, reportedly holding $12.7 million in deferred stock compensation, criticized the bank’s “transformation” efforts and high costs.” (Link below.)

Taken together, these points raise compelling questions about how Citi evaluates senior leadership hires and manages cultural risk at the top of the organisation. It also raises eyebrows with regard to governance. Should Jane Fraser have been elevated to Board Chair when she is an insider on all of these decisions? And was the $25M “signing bonus” she got for that title appropriate? Even banking analyst Mike Mayo criticized it as inappropriate.

The press will be watching this space and the comments section of the FT closely for potentially newsworthy leads.

https://www.ft.com/content/e45c2c21-babe-4fd9-85f1-2b2b3aa38872

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-10-31/ex-citigroup-bankers-urge-board-to-claw-back-hundreds-of-bonuses

Similar Posts

  • Story 30

    Was doing analyst recruitment for my team at Citi Investment Banking. Interviewed a lot of people and concluded that two young women would be a great addition to the team – they were much stronger and eager than anyone else I interviewed. When group head learnt about it, he called me to his office and…

  • Story 17

    Read Sarah Butcher’s article on eFinancialCareers today. The timing is striking, given the woman who went viral on LinkedIn yesterday after saying she was suing one of the largest VC funds in the world for pay discrimination and more. It sounds like she was dared by the firm to speak publicly – and did. The…

  • Story 289

    Re: Story 281: The Closing of Books Twenty-five years ago, Enron’s annual reports gleamed, praised by the analysts. Somewhere in Houston, a woman sat at her desk and wrote a letter that no one wanted to read — because it was inconvenient. The machine had already committed to its story. The auditors had signed. The…

  • Story 261

    It looks like story 258 is referring to the Tampa office, but I want to echo what they describe about the Tech & Data culture. I’m an Indian woman who studied at a top IIT. I was relocated from Madras to the Dallas office in 2019. What people say about an “Indian mafia” probably sounds…

  • Story 356

    Most of Citi’s current and former Black senior leaders were not developed exclusively within the organization. They were recruited because they brought distinguished credentials, significant leadership experience, and proven records of delivering results. They were accomplished executives who chose Citi, many during a period when the company publicly committed to increasing diversity within its leadership…

  • Story 296

    Okay, am I the only one wondering what happened here? For forever, Goldman Sachs had a reputation for being one of the most toxic places on Wall Street for women. I’m 50. Left not long after the financial crisis and it was certainly my experience. So where are all the women who can talk about…