Story 69

I worked at Goldman Sachs in Hong Kong for almost a decade. For most of that time, my performance and commitment were never in question. That changed the moment I announced my pregnancy.

From that point on, I noticed a clear shift in how I was treated. When I returned from maternity leave, a junior team member was effectively being positioned to take over my role. It was immediately apparent that there was no longer a place for me on the team.

For nearly a full quarter after I resumed, I had no meaningful work assignments, no roadmap, and no support structure. During this period, I heard rumours that I was being considered for layoffs but could not be let go due to my maternity status. Within a year of returning from leave, I was indeed terminated.

Instead of reintegration support, I was assigned a technically complex project with no additional resourcing. My line manager repeatedly threatened me in private one-on-one meetings—raising concerns about deadlines, delivery, and how I was being perceived by senior management. I was consistently targeted and placed under disproportionate scrutiny.

The broader engineering organisation was highly political. Senior technical leadership lacked hands-on expertise and focused primarily on self-preservation. Headcount was inflated, projects were delayed, and accountability was absent. Talented junior and mid-level employees carried the real load, while senior managers engaged in internal politics to protect their positions.

After DEI initiatives were quietly deprioritized, I began to observe a troubling pattern: employees—particularly women—being laid off globally within a year of returning from parental leave.

During this time, I experienced a personal emergency and a personal health issue. While management outwardly projected support, it felt performative. In reality, I faced exclusion, gaslighting, and a complete absence of genuine accommodation.

One of my co-managers was a woman and a mother herself. That made the experience even more painful. Rather than empathy, I encountered hostility and aggression. Another co-manager consistently claimed to support me but failed to take any concrete action, seemingly unwilling to challenge the system as he approached retirement.

The cumulative impact of this treatment led to severe anxiety and depression following my return from maternity leave.

I am currently on a career break and questioning whether returning to corporate finance is worth the personal cost. I accepted severance and signed an NDA, which prevents me from naming individuals—but that does not erase what happened.

I am sharing this because these experiences are not isolated. They are structural. A culture that enforces rigid return-to-office mandates, deprioritises caregiving realities, and sidelines women after parental leave will never retain diverse talent in the long run.

I have moved on, but I believe accountability matters. Stories like mine deserve to be heard.

Similar Posts

  • Story 144

    I worked at Citi for a number of years and I feel like I will be unwinding the brain damage for years to come. I am admittedly naive when it comes to corporate culture: do the work, keep your nose clean, reap the benefits. That is, in fact, how I successfully navigated my career of…

  • Story 308

    To story 307, I went through the exact same in another group, we are not liars or crazy. With all the proof in the world, HR will never ever investigate anything. In my case a lawyer got involved and I managed to leave on my own, but everything else is the same playbook. In my…

  • Story 315

    A Forensic Autopsy of a Career Assassination: The Promise. The Reorg. The Demotion. There is a particular kind of institutional betrayal that is engineered to look like circumstance. In ERM Tech & Data at Citi, where in-group loyalty overrides merit and the rule of law, a role was promised. Then she raised concerns — about…

  • Story 157

    At Citi, I requested an Ethics investigation and submitted a lot of documentation in support of my claims. When the investigator called me, she did not engage with the submitted documentation. They stuck with narrative — as if they had chosen not to look at specific aspects to avoid surfacing any uncomfortable truths. The complaint…

  • Story 27

    In the last performance review cycle, it was mandatory for at least 5% of employees to receive the lowest grade (4). It’s an open secret that anyone with a 4 is being put on a PIP that’s deliberately impossible to pass, so they’ll all be let go of in 3 months with no pay out….

  • Story 215

    Wow. In my years in this industry, I have never encountered another organization generating this volume and variety of controversy. Ouch. Reading a number of threads on this site has been jaw-dropping about Citi. The pattern is now too consistent to ignore. The current COO presided over the Wealth business before the current Global Wealth…