Story 249

To Story 246 / 247, and to this forum:

Thank you for your extension. It added something your original response couldn’t carry alone — the self-implication, the long road, the honest accounting of what it cost you to get here. It allowed me to hear you differently, and I’m grateful you shared it.

I want to offer the same honesty in return.

When I wrote 242, I was not describing unfinished interior work borne of being uninformed. I was describing a different conclusion — arrived at through the same decades of lived experience, the same price of reprogramming, the same refusal to stay silent that you named in your own story. The complexity I expressed was not a threshold I hadn’t yet crossed. It was the view from the other side of one.

You named something real about internalized oppression, and I am not unfamiliar with how it operates. But framing complexity as complicity speaks over another woman’s own narrative — and I think, given what you shared in your extension, you know exactly how that feels.

Here is where we part ways, with more directness than I offered in 242.

Feminism and masculinism are mirror structures. One is not the liberation from the other. Both organize identity and power around gender as the primary axis.

I am not failing to choose a side. I am choosing to stand on different ground — a professional world where contribution is not filtered through the lens of gender at all. That is not passivity. Transcendence is not passivity. It is choosing where and how you fight.

The risk I see in demanding alignment is that it reproduces the us-versus-them logic that made the patriarchy possible in the first place. I don’t want to win that war. I want to make it obsolete. As long as we are bound to the fight by opposition, we are still defined by what we’re fighting against.

For as long as I can remember, I have not defined myself by gender — by my intellect, yes, my empathy, yes, my willingness to speak up and get in trouble on behalf of others, yes. I will not reduce myself to gender to wage the very ground shift I believe in.

And yet — your extension reminded me of something I want to hold onto.

It has taken us both decades to arrive where we are. That journey is not over for either of us. What matters most, perhaps, is that we hold space for the women still mid-path — because we know what it cost to get here, and we know that cost is real, and ongoing, and not the same for everyone.

The grace we extend to each other in that recognition may be the most radical thing we do.

I believe that difference in method belongs in the conversation that this forum exists to have.

Similar Posts

  • Story 371

    I learned about this site today from a woman who is familiar with the high-profile lawsuits involving Citi. Coincidentally, [REDACTED] of Morgan Lewis, who is representing Citi in some of these matters, was one of the attorneys who represented Merrill Lynch in employment cases in the mid 2010’s. I know because I was a plaintiff….

  • Story 231

    The Charlotte market executive for Merrill Lynch shared the ‘2026 Forbes ‘Best in State Wealth Advisors’ celebrating his team on LinkedIn yesterday – Several years ago, I was first hand witness to a peer female intern enduring weeks of ongoing sexual harassment by one of those ‘celebrated’. He literally referred to himself as the ‘Wolf…

  • Story 115

    Law across jurisdictions should not enforce mediation, arbitration, or NDAs with the corporates in workplace sexual harassment cases because they undermine accountability and the public purpose of anti-harassment law. Sexual harassment is not a private contractual dispute but a violation of dignity, equality, and statutory rights. Forcing such claims into confidential processes removes them from…

  • Story 94

    I am shaking as I write this. I have spent a long time suppressing what I have experienced, largely out of fear. Fear of retaliation, fear of attaching my name to something that could have consequences for my career. I am a current employee based in Florida and have worked on the Technology side of…

  • Story 341

    Dear Story 340, do not be discouraged or dismayed. What you are noting is a textbook corporate counter-offensive to a perceived threat: the impact of truth-telling thanks to the Wall Street Discriminates platform. Here’s what I would like to point out: First, on the question of Fraser’s relationship with Trump: let’s be precise about what’s…