Story 257

A male MD told me that what I was complaining about at Citi is the same at every other large bank. He questioned whether I’d ever worked at one before — implying I was naive or uninformed about how the world works. At my age and level of experience, I am neither naive nor uninformed anymore.

I want to name what that comment does, because it does two things simultaneously, and neither is accidental.

First, it removes his and Citi’s responsibility to act. If it’s universal, why fix it?

Second, it gaslights me for raising the concern. I wasn’t describing a problem — I was revealing my own deficient career trajectory.

But here’s what struck me most: if a male MD says “it’s the same everywhere” with that kind of confidence, he learned it. Which means he knows. And knowing, he’s chosen to explain it to me rather than do anything about it himself.

And even if he’s right — even if it is the same at other banks — that doesn’t make it legal or ethical. It doesn’t make it inevitable.

It makes it a widespread industry failure, which is a stronger argument for regulatory intervention — not an excuse for institutional inaction. “It’s normal” is exactly how systemic misconduct sustains itself.

I have worked at another large bank. I was never subject to anything approaching Citi’s level of insanity.

One more thing, because I’ve read the lawsuits and the coverage: the public record of what happens to women at Citi skews almost entirely to senior women in Markets and Wealth Management.

I work in the middle and back office. It is no better here. It has just been less visible so far. References to the Indian Mafia on this site are a strong signal.

Similar Posts

  • Story 367

    A co-worker told me a certain Managing Director “hated me because I came from the team” that she had just taken over. I had made the productive and professional choice to leave that team due to undermining, bullying, retaliation and incompetent management. When she attempted to block my transfer (which had already been agreed with…

  • Story 225

    When the institution betrays those it employs for their livelihoods. Managers who don’t manage. Leaders who don’t lead. There’s a question that gets wielded like a weapon at Citi: If you’re not happy, why don’t you leave? It sounds like honesty. It isn’t. It’s a deflection — a way of avoiding accountability while making discontent…

  • Story 231

    The Charlotte market executive for Merrill Lynch shared the ‘2026 Forbes ‘Best in State Wealth Advisors’ celebrating his team on LinkedIn yesterday – Several years ago, I was first hand witness to a peer female intern enduring weeks of ongoing sexual harassment by one of those ‘celebrated’. He literally referred to himself as the ‘Wolf…

  • Story 143

    Watching the grilling of Pam Bondi by Congress was inspirational. This is the level of scrutiny that should be applied to raised concerns at Citi—but they’ve rigged the game so it seldom happens. The arbitration clause exists to cover all manners of corporate sins. The release they want you to sign is the lid on…

  • Editorial Comment

    We declined to post several submissions yesterday that were nothing but personal attacks and/or contained threatening language against a particular institution. We don’t know if it was a setup but, either way, it is not consistent with the purpose of this platform. WallStreetDiscriminates exists to surface real experiences and identify patterns that would otherwise remain…

  • Story 71

    My manager at Citi (very visible MD in the U.S. within a critical professional advisory global function) would often call my peer female colleagues b!#che$ and c@nt$. Those exact words. And basically rip them constantly. On ZOOM calls. I never make waves. Never. I’m a senior, experienced professional myself who has been in the trenches…