Story 249

To Story 246 / 247, and to this forum:

Thank you for your extension. It added something your original response couldn’t carry alone — the self-implication, the long road, the honest accounting of what it cost you to get here. It allowed me to hear you differently, and I’m grateful you shared it.

I want to offer the same honesty in return.

When I wrote 242, I was not describing unfinished interior work borne of being uninformed. I was describing a different conclusion — arrived at through the same decades of lived experience, the same price of reprogramming, the same refusal to stay silent that you named in your own story. The complexity I expressed was not a threshold I hadn’t yet crossed. It was the view from the other side of one.

You named something real about internalized oppression, and I am not unfamiliar with how it operates. But framing complexity as complicity speaks over another woman’s own narrative — and I think, given what you shared in your extension, you know exactly how that feels.

Here is where we part ways, with more directness than I offered in 242.

Feminism and masculinism are mirror structures. One is not the liberation from the other. Both organize identity and power around gender as the primary axis.

I am not failing to choose a side. I am choosing to stand on different ground — a professional world where contribution is not filtered through the lens of gender at all. That is not passivity. Transcendence is not passivity. It is choosing where and how you fight.

The risk I see in demanding alignment is that it reproduces the us-versus-them logic that made the patriarchy possible in the first place. I don’t want to win that war. I want to make it obsolete. As long as we are bound to the fight by opposition, we are still defined by what we’re fighting against.

For as long as I can remember, I have not defined myself by gender — by my intellect, yes, my empathy, yes, my willingness to speak up and get in trouble on behalf of others, yes. I will not reduce myself to gender to wage the very ground shift I believe in.

And yet — your extension reminded me of something I want to hold onto.

It has taken us both decades to arrive where we are. That journey is not over for either of us. What matters most, perhaps, is that we hold space for the women still mid-path — because we know what it cost to get here, and we know that cost is real, and ongoing, and not the same for everyone.

The grace we extend to each other in that recognition may be the most radical thing we do.

I believe that difference in method belongs in the conversation that this forum exists to have.

Similar Posts

  • Story 66

    I worked at Citi in London until about 15 years ago. I was initially hired to resolve a major operations issue before transitioning to the trading desk.During my time in operations, a senior managing director repeatedly made explicit sexual comments toward me, such as saying he wanted to f**k me, often in front of colleagues…

  • Story 260

    Dear Editor – I made one important addition to story 257. Kindly substitute: A male MD told me that what I was complaining about at Citi is the same at every other large bank. He questioned whether I’d ever worked at one before — implying I was naive or uninformed about how the world works….

  • Story 267

    Gentle reader, this author has observed many a spectacle in her time. Yet nothing — not the most brazen advancement seeker of no particular merit, not the most shameless title hunter — quite prepares one for the singular institution that is Citi. For at Citi, no one will give you a job description. But if…

  • Story 82

    i’ve had a few experiences in my nearly 10 yr career which i link to being a woman, nothing crazy but not ideal and i feel like ive had to jump hurdles and would probably be further if i was a guy. happy hearing what people think. ok lets go – tier 1 us investment…

  • Story 26

    It’s sad to say but all common pattern you listed here are so true and happened to me in a major financial institution: 1) not equal base pay with men 2) pay reduction by 40% during maternity leave year while being on leave only for 4 months 3) HR system is weaponised, I saw as…